Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40521569›Full record

ArticleGynecology and minimally invasive therapy

Comprehensive Evaluation of Ovarian Growths in Young Women.

Mukta Agarwal, Smita Singh, Sudwita Sinha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mukta AgarwalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AIIMS, Patna, Bihar, India.
Smita SinghDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AIIMS, Patna, Bihar, India.
Sudwita SinhaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AIIMS, Patna, Bihar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Adolescents represent a significant demographic in hospital outpatient visits, and it is important to give them special consideration and conduct a thorough examination for any adnexal pathology. The research aimed to study adnexal masses in adolescent females aged 10-19 years, including their clinical, biochemical, and radiological evaluations. The goal was to develop a treatment plan and analyze its relationship with histopathological findings. Materials and Methods: The study was carried out at a single center and included 124 participants in a descriptive research design. Results: During the study, 6.2% of adolescents had adnexal masses, with abdominal discomfort being the most common symptom (66.12%). Ultrasound scans showed cystic, solid, or complex masses in 41.6%, 23.4%, and 35% of cases, respectively. In 53.4% of the patients, tumors exceeding 10 cm in size were identified, while 66.67% exhibited elevated levels of tumor markers. Surgical procedures were necessary for 48.5% of adolescents, with laparoscopic cystectomy being carried out in 48.34% and staging laparotomy in 46.66%. Conclusion: Small asymptomatic cysts need to be monitored, but larger complex or solid tumors must all be thoroughly examined to rule out malignancy. Early diagnosis and preservation of the ovary should be the aim of treatment. Although guidelines exist for the treatment of adnexal masses in adults, there is limited information available in the literature regarding adolescents. Therefore, it is crucial to establish an appropriate surgical plan that preserves fertility in this vulnerable age group.

Indexed as

Adnexal massadolescentcystectomyovarian cystteenagetumor

Identifiers

PMID40521569
PMCPMC12165670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.