Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40521565›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Highly Sensitive Square Wave Adsorptive Stripping Voltammetric Determination of Dopamine in Human Plasma Using a Cytosine-Modified Pencil Graphite Electrode.

Şeyma Korkmaz, Ayşen Demir Mülazımoğlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Şeyma KorkmazChemistry Department, Institute of Science, Necmettin Erbakan University, 42090 Konya, Turkey.
Ayşen Demir MülazımoğluChemistry Department, Ahmet Keleşoğlu Education Faculty, Necmettin Erbakan University, 42090 Konya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5780-3056

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dopamine (DA) is an essential neurotransmitter in the central nervous system, playing a vital role in the human brain. A simple, facile, fast, and low-cost method based on the cytosine-modified pencil graphite electrode (CT/PGE) was developed to determine dopamine (DA) by using the square wave adsorptive stripping voltammetry (SWAdSV) technique. The cytosine (CT) was modified on the bare pencil graphite electrode (PGE) by conducting cyclic voltammetry (CV) over a potential range between +0.7 and +1.9 V for 10 cycles. A number of techniques including CV, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) were used to characterize the CT/PGE. The impact of varying pH values (6.4, 6.8, 7.2, 7.6, and 8.0) and phosphate buffer solution (PBS) on the DA determination was studied using the square wave voltammetry (SWV) technique. The basic voltammetric techniques SWV, SWAdSV, differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), and differential pulse adsorptive stripping voltammetry (DPAdSV) were used to determine the most suitable method for analytical applications. The accumulation time was optimized using the SWAdSV technique on the CT/PGE, within a potential range of -0.4 to +0.4 V. The CT/PGE was evaluated in the presence of several interferents, such as urea, ascorbic acid, and uric acid. Under optimum conditions, the CT/PGE exhibited a well-defined linear relationship for DA across the concentration ranges of 0.1 mM to 0.5 μM and 0.1 μM to 7.5 nM, with a limit of detection (LOD) of 2.28 nM and a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 6.85 nM. The suggested method was effectively applied to the determination of DA in human plasma serum samples to evaluate its suitability.

Identifiers

PMID40521565
PMCPMC12163804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.