Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40521549›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Systematic Quality Assurance/Quality Control Framework for a Volatile Organic Compound Real-Time Monitoring Instrument, Autonomous Rugged Optical Multigas Analyzer for VOCs.

Hong Cheng Tay, Anthony Miller, Hunter N B Moseley, Lila Beckley, Kelly G Pennell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hong Cheng TayDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7503-2176
Anthony MillerEntanglement Technologies, Inc., San Bruno, California 94066, United States.
Hunter N B MoseleyUniversity of Kentucky Superfund Research Center (UKSRC), Lexington, Kentucky 40506, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3995-5368
Lila BeckleyGSI Environmental Inc., Austin, Texas 78759, United States.
Kelly G PennellDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3423-9610

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a systematic quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) framework for new technology adopters to validate environmental monitoring instruments when consistent, standardized validation and calibration procedures do not readily exist. This QA/QC framework is especially relevant for newly developed environmental monitoring instruments prior to deployment in field settings as part of environmental site investigations. Key QA/QC parameters used in the framework include repeatability, intermediate precision, reproducibility, linearity, limits of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), trueness, and recovery. The QA/QC framework is demonstrated on the autonomous rugged optical multigas analyzer for VOCs (AROMA-VOC), a technology that employs cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) with preconcentration and chromatographic separation prior to CRDS detection. QA/QC protocols for nine VOCs, and results for AROMA-VOC were compared with laboratory-based gas chromatography/mass spectrometer (GC-MS). Results demonstrated high linearity (

Identifiers

PMID40521549
PMCPMC12163652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.