Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40521454›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Acceleration of the GROMACS Free-Energy Perturbation Calculations on GPUs.

Yiqi Chen, Jian Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yiqi ChenMetaX Integrated (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, Shanghai 200001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7932-897X
Jian YangMetaX Integrated (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, Shanghai 200001, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free-energy perturbation (FEP) calculations have emerged as a promising tool for the accurate prediction of ligand binding affinities. However, their widespread adoption in drug discovery pipelines has been hindered by long computation times and complex workflow setups. Here, we introduce an optimized graphics processing unit (GPU)-resident FEP implementation within GROMACS. The GPU-enabled FEP calculations are validated on a benchmark system containing eight ligand-protein pairs, including two charged ligands, on both the Nvidia A100 and the MetaX C500 GPU platforms. The absolute binding free energies predicted on these GPUs show excellent agreement (around 1.0 kcal/mol) with previous CPU-computed results. Compared to a 32-core CPU implementation, the GPU-accelerated FEP calculations demonstrate significant speed-ups, with up to nearly 800 and 400% improvements on Nvidia A100 and MetaX C500 GPUs, respectively. The end-to-end absolute binding free-energy calculations for the benchmark systems are reduced from 400 h to around 48 h on the A100 GPU. These advancements aim to provide the alchemical free-energy community with a fast and efficient way of conducting FEP calculations, thereby paving the way for a highly accurate and computationally efficient solution in predicting ligand-protein binding free energies. All codes, data, and scripts are included in our open-source project, FEP-on-GPU workflow, freely available at https://github.com/yiqichenshallwetalk/FEP-on-GPU-Workflow.

Identifiers

PMID40521454
PMCPMC12163693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.