Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40521436›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Fabrication and Characterization of PAA‑

Funeka Matebese, Mabore J Raseala, Meladi L Motloutsi, Richard M Moutloali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funeka MatebeseInstitute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, Florida 1709, South Africa.
Mabore J RasealaInstitute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, Florida 1709, South Africa.
Meladi L MotloutsiInstitute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, Florida 1709, South Africa.
Richard M MoutloaliInstitute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, Florida 1709, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2965-5241

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adoption of polymeric membranes for reclamation of natural organic pollutant-impacted water has been of recent interest. However, membrane fouling has been an obstacle in the application of membranes over a longer period. Fouling, which is mainly caused by organic materials, is a universal challenge in membrane technology for water treatment. The hydrophobic nature of poly-(ether sulfone) (PES) membranes has a high affinity toward organic compounds. To elevate this challenge, in this study, hydrophilic brushes of poly-(acrylic acid) (PAA) were grafted onto the PES backbone using free radical graft polymerization. The successful grafting of PAA brushes on PES was confirmed through characterization using Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometry,

Identifiers

PMID40521436
PMCPMC12163682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.