Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40521434›Full record

ArticleExperimental mechanics2025

An

K Yuan, M Mokhtarishirazabad, S Mckendrey, R Clark, M Peel, M Mostafavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental mechanics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

K YuanUniveristy of Bristol, University Walk, BS8 1TR Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6083-0071
M MokhtarishirazabadUniveristy of Bristol, University Walk, BS8 1TR Bristol, United Kingdom.
S MckendreyUniveristy of Bristol, University Walk, BS8 1TR Bristol, United Kingdom.
R ClarkNational Nuclear Laboratory, 102B Stonehouse Park, Sperry Way, GL10 3UT Stonehouse, United Kingdom.
M PeelUniveristy of Bristol, University Walk, BS8 1TR Bristol, United Kingdom.
M MostafaviMonash University, 17 College Walk, Melbourne, Victoria 3168 Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spent AGR (advanced gas-cooled reactor) fuel cladding may suffer from stress corrosion cracking (SCC) during the interim storage period in cooling ponds and compromise the structural integrity of fuel storage. Objective: To better understand the effect of SCC, a new small punch test (SPT) setup was developed in this study that can use a small volume of sample to limit the safety concerns about irradiated materials. Methods: The SPT setup accelerated SCC in a surrogate material 304 stainless steel by introducing a circulation of a heated corrosive solution. Preliminary tests were performed to find the loading and environmental conditions that can develop SCC in the surrogate material. A finite element model was used to estimate the mechanical behaviour of the material during the test. Results: Several samples were tested under different conditions, and SCC and other forms of corrosion behaviours were observed on the samples. The effects of different corrosive environments were obtained by further characterisation including scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and optical profilometry. Conclusions: The experiment demonstrated the new setup can develop SCC from a small volume of sample in a short period of time. Several improvements are listed including extra procedures to enable the experiments on the irradiated fuel materials.

Indexed as

Materials characterisationMechanical propertiesSmall punch test (SPT)Stainless steelStress corrosion cracking (SCC)

Identifiers

PMID40521434
PMCPMC12159102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.