ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2025
Bifid mandibular canal assessment and its relevance to local anesthesia.
Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Accessory Mandibular Foramina: An Anatomical Study in Dry Mandibles and Meta-Analysis.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The frequent use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has drawn attention to the anatomical variations of the mandibular canal (MC). This study aimed to analyze the bifid mandibular canal (BMC) types, frequency, and impact of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). Methods: This study included 142 CBCT scans. For the analysis of the BMC types, an established classification method was used. CBCT sagittal and transverse planes were used to analyze the occurrences, dimensions of the BMC types, and differences based on the sex and age of patients. Results: The frequency of BMC was 9.2%. There were no statistically significant differences in the occurrence related to sex (P = 0.317), age (P = 1.000), or localization (P = 0.317). The average BMC diameter ranged from 1.2 to 2.5 mm. The largest BMC diameter was in the retromolar region. Conclusion: The high incidence of BMC must be considered during IANB. Untimely identification of anatomic variations in the MC can lead to IANB anesthesia failure, as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.