ArticleClinical simulation in nursing2024
Low Resource, High Impact: Just-In-Time Training Toolkit in Response to a Public Health Crisis.
Article in Clinical simulation in nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Infectious disease crisis requires incident specific training and presents unique circumstances for teaching and learning to protect patients and healthcare workers. This toolkit was developed by a team of nurse educators and infection prevention researchers to a) offer training to nurses and nursing students who were frontline healthcare providers during the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of personal protective equipment in the context of the hierarchy of controls and b) evaluate the just-in-time training using simulation methods. Methods: Interactive content for online delivery was developed, including briefing, simulation content, and debriefing. Participants were recruited via professional, practice, and academic networks. Instructors and learners were asked to complete an evaluation on satisfaction with learning, self-confidence, and design. Data were collected between 05/20 and 09/23; descriptive quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed. Results: Demographic data from 1,239 participants across 18 countries shows the majority were female (89%), 20-30 years old (81%), nurses (97%), and practiced in academic (48%) settings. Evaluation data from instructors (N = 39) and learners (N=1,159) was positive overall ( Conclusion: Simulation for just-in-time training with online video observation during a pandemic offers nurse educators in academia and practice settings a rapid, feasible, and safe method of learning crisis-specific infection prevention and occupational safety practice guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.