ArticleEJHaem2025
Outcomes for Patients With Myeloid Neoplasms Treated With Chemotherapy Plus Venetoclax After Prior Venetoclax Therapy.
Article in EJHaem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcomes of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia after menin inhibition failure.Blood advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Outcomes for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) that have progression after treatment with hypomethylating agent (HMA) and venetoclax (VEN) are poor. However, data for chemotherapy and VEN (C+VEN) therapy after prior treatment with HMA+VEN are limited. Methods: We identified 18 patients with AML or MDS/AML who received C+VEN after prior HMA+VEN. Results: Complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) was achieved in 7 patients (39%) and 6 patients (33%) proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Conclusion: This study shows suggests that C+VEN could be a viable option in a subset of patients after HMA+VEN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.