ArticleJornal vascular brasileiro2025
Expression of plasma levels of MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Article in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxidative Stress-Induced DNA Damage Response Pathways in Aortic Disease: Implications for Inflammation and Vascular Degeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Targeting the CD47-TSP1 Axis in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Novel Immunotherapeutic Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is now considered the preferred treatment modality in most abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients. Objectives: The objective of this study was to quantify and evaluate MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 expression response to EVAR based on serum assays at 6-month follow-up. Methods: 47 patients with AAA who underwent EVAR and ten people with no comorbidities were recruited for the study. Plasma levels of MMPs and TIMPs were assayed by ELISA preoperatively and after 6 months in the group submitted to EVAR and only once in the control group. Demographic profiles, clinical follow-up data, and imaging exams with angiotomography performed preoperatively and after 6 months were collected. Results: Forty-seven patients with AAA were treated with EVAR. 87.2% of these patients were male and 68.08% were smokers. There were no deaths in the first 30 days. Ten patients (21.27%) had an endoleak during the 6-month postoperative period. Higher MMP and TIMP levels were observed in the AAA patients compared with patients in the control group, although without statistical significance. After EVAR, there were increases in MMP and TIMP levels both in the group with endoleaks and in the group without endoleaks (p<0.05). The variables related to demographic and anatomical data and types of devices used by the patients did not show statistical significance, except for a significant reduction in aneurysmal sac diameter (p<0.05). Conclusions: None of the markers assessed showed any association with endoleak status. However, the concentrations of MMPs and TIMPs in circulation increased in all patients after EVAR. Collectively, these findings suggest that the markers assessed have little potential to influence current post-EVAR monitoring practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.