Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40521336›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

Changes in sugar-sweetened beverages and non-essential energy-dense food purchases overall and by type before and after the implementation of taxes in Mexico: repeated cross-sectional national surveys (2008-2018).

Claudia Gabriela García-Chávez, Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutierrez, Shu Wen Ng, Juan A Rivera, M Arantxa Colchero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The role of regulatory policies on unhealthy commodities to prevent and control noncommunicable diseases in the Americas.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claudia Gabriela García-ChávezCenter for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5520-8568
Tonatiuh Barrientos-GutierrezCenter for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0826-9106
Shu Wen NgCarolina Population Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0582-110X
Juan A RiveraCenter for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2586-4908
M Arantxa ColcheroCenter for Evaluation and Surveys Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4891-7120

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In January 2014, the Mexican federal government implemented a tax to sugar-sweetened beverages of 1 peso per litre and an 8% tax to non-essential energy-dense foods. Prior studies have evaluated the association of these taxes on household purchases, but none considered the potential heterogeneity of purchases by type of store. We aimed to estimate the impact of the taxes on food and beverage purchases in Mexican households overall and by type of store. Methods: We estimated changes in the quantity purchasesd of taxed and untaxed food and beverages using six rounds of the Mexican National Household Income and Expenditures Survey, which are repeated cross-sectional surveys. To estimate changes in purchases, we used a two-part model, testing for interactions by type of store to assess effect modifications. Results: During the 4 years after the implementation of the taxes, purchases of non-essential energy-dense foods and sugar-sweetened beverages decreased on average by -7.0% and -4.4%, respectively. There was also a slight decrease in purchases of untaxed foods (-1.7%), while untaxed beverages increased by 10.9%. The largest reductions for taxed foods were found in small neighbourhood stores (-19.0%). We did not observe significant heterogeneity in the remaining types of stores. For SSBs, public markets showed the largest decrease (-22.7%) followed by small neighbourhood stores (-11.4%), while increases were observed in convenience stores (44.8%) and other stores (22.2%). The high increases in convenience and other stores suggest that taxes may not be fully passed on to prices, that promotional pricing was used to offset the tax or that these increases reflect secular trends. Conclusion: Despite the modest amounts of taxes in Mexico, reductions in purchases were documented 4 years after implementation, emphasising the potential benefits of increasing the taxes. Heterogeneity in purchases by store types suggests the need to analyse differences in the tax pass-through and its mechanisms at the store level.

Indexed as

cross-sectional studieseconomicspublic healthsupermarkets

Identifiers

PMID40521336
PMCPMC12164364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.