ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2025
Non-invasive mapping of ventricular action potential waveforms reconstructed from clinical unshielded magnetocardiography. Potential diagnostic application and current limitations.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Non-Invasive Mapping of Ventricular Action Potential Reconstructed from Contactless Magnetocardiographic Recordings in Intact and Conscious Guinea Pigs.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and limitations of reconstructing ventricular action potential waveforms using non-invasive, unshielded magnetocardiographic mapping (uMCG), highlighting differences between healthy individuals and patients, even at the current level of precision. Methods: Clinical uMCG was performed using a 36-channel DC-SQUID system. The mathematical reconstruction method developed by Kandori et al. was applied to derive reconstructed ventricular action potential waveforms (rVAPw) from uMCG data in 10 healthy volunteers and 12 patients with various cardiac abnormalities. In four cases, simultaneous recordings of uMCG and right ventricular monophasic action potentials (RVMAP) were obtained using an amagnetic catheter technique. Results: Reconstruction of rVAPw from uMCG signals was feasible in all subjects. Waveforms derived from 90-s averaged uMCG signals were comparable to those obtained with 300-s averages. The rVAPw closely matched the simultaneously recorded RVMAP waveforms. Compared to healthy individuals, patients showed a significant prolongation of rVAPw phase-0 (p < 0.01) and a trend toward increased total duration (p = 0.06), demonstrating the method's sensitivity to electrophysiological abnormalities. Conclusions: While incomplete rVAPw at some MCG mapping sites reflects the current spatial resolution limitations of the uMCG array, the close alignment between rVAPw and RVMAP recordings suggests that 90-s uMCG acquisitions may suffice for reliable, non-invasive imaging of ventricular action potentials in clinical practice. These findings support further development of MCG technology as a medical device uniquely suited to bridge experimental and clinical applications by enabling non-invasive rVAPw mapping in patients. Future improvements in sensor technology, mathematical modelling, and multimodal imaging may allow for near-cellular spatial resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.