Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40521298›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025

Meniscal centralization significantly improve clinical outcomes and reduce meniscal extrusion with minimal complications: A systematic review.

Alessandro Carrozzo, Francesco Bosco, Leandro Ramazzini, Fortunato Giustra, Virginia Masoni, Marcello Capella, Michele Malavolta, Jae-Sung An, Hideyuki Koga

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Meniscal extrusion: Multiple theories, one clinical challenge.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alessandro CarrozzoUniversità degli Studi "Link Campus University", Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita, della Salute e delle Professioni Sanitarie Rome Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0700-8139
Francesco BoscoDepartment of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.) University of Palermo Palermo Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8306-1869
Leandro RamazziniDepartment of Orthopedics Casa di Cura Solatrix Rovereto Italy.
Fortunato GiustraDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco di Torino - ASL Città di Torino Turin Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6386-2933
Virginia MasoniDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology University of Turin, CTO Turin Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6704-361X
Marcello CapellaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology University of Turin, CTO Turin Italy.
Michele MalavoltaDepartment of Orthopedics Casa di Cura Solatrix Rovereto Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1636-6421
Jae-Sung AnDepartment of Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Institute of Science Tokyo Japan.
Hideyuki KogaDepartment of Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Institute of Science Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4574-1796

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Meniscal extrusion alters joint biomechanics and accelerates cartilage degeneration, contributing to the progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Meniscal centralization techniques aim to reposition the meniscus, addressing extrusion and restoring load distribution. This systematic review aims to evaluate meniscal centralization's clinical and radiological outcomes, hypothesizing its efficacy in treating symptomatic meniscal extrusion with minimal complications. Methods: This review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023484353). Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Science Direct and Scopus. Studies reporting clinical and/or radiological outcomes of meniscal centralization with ≥24 months of follow-up were included. Data on demographics, surgical techniques, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), imaging findings and complications were extracted. Methodological quality was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool, and heterogeneity was evaluated via the Results: Four studies (113 patients, mean follow-up: 24-35 months) met inclusion criteria. Arthroscopic meniscal centralization with suture anchors significantly improved PROMs, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) scores, demonstrating symptom relief and functional recovery. Lysholm scores improved from 46.0 to 96.5, KOOS pain from 47.4 to 88.9, and IKDC from 51.8 to 75.8 ( Conclusions: Meniscal centralization effectively reduces extrusion, improves clinical outcomes, and restores knee function with minimal complications. However, further long-term and comparative studies are needed to validate these findings and refine surgical indications. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Indexed as

arthroscopybiomechanicscentralizationkneemeniscus

Identifiers

PMID40521298
PMCPMC12167631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.