ArticleArthroplasty today2025
Comparative Efficacy of ChatGPT and DeepSeek in Addressing Patient Queries on Gonarthrosis and Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- From adoption to interaction: examining human-GenAI engagement patterns, ethical tensions, and educational trade-offs in nursing education.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Evaluation of ChatGPT-4o's and DeepSeek R1's responses to urological problems: a comparative study.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Applications of DeepSeek in Medicine: Bibliometric Analysis and Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes and reporting quality of large language model interventions in practice: a systematic evidence map.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Promoting Responsible DeepSeek Deployment in Health Care: Scoping Review Comparing Grey and White Literature.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- The Development and Evaluation of a Retrieval-Augmented Generation Large Language Model Virtual Assistant for Postoperative Instructions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comment on "Comparative Efficacy of ChatGPT and DeepSeek in Addressing Patient Queries on Gonarthrosis and Total Knee Arthroplasty".Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has opened new avenues for patient education and anxiety reduction. This study aims to compare the efficacy of 2 prominent AI platforms, ChatGPT and DeepSeek, in providing accurate and satisfactory responses to patients with gonarthrosis contemplating total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: A prospective, comparative trial was conducted involving 100 patients diagnosed with gonarthrosis and indicated for TKA. Each patient posed 5 questions regarding the surgery and postoperative rehabilitation to both ChatGPT and DeepSeek. Responses were evaluated by 2 blinded orthopaedic specialists on a 10-point scale for accuracy and patient satisfaction. Patients also rated their satisfaction with each response on a 10-point scale. The primary outcome measures were the mean accuracy scores from specialists and mean satisfaction scores from patients. Results: Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between ChatGPT and DeepSeek in both accuracy and patient satisfaction ( Conclusions: This study demonstrates that ChatGPT offers more accurate and satisfactory responses to patient queries regarding gonarthrosis and TKA compared to DeepSeek. The findings suggest that AI platforms, particularly ChatGPT, can serve as valuable tools in augmenting patient education and potentially reducing preoperative anxiety. Future research should explore the integration of AI-assisted information delivery in clinical practice and its long-term impact on patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.