ArticleArthroplasty today2025
Artificial Intelligence Approach in Hip Prosthesis Identification and Addressing Radiographic Outcome Measures.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Hybrid Automatic Model for Circle Detection in X-Ray Imagery: A Case Study on Hip Prosthesis Wear.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiographic assessment is crucial for the success of a hip arthroplasty procedure as a correctly positioned prosthesis indicates favorable long-term outcomes. This project aims to develop a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based method that can (1) automatically identify the presence of a hip resurfacing prosthesis in radiographs and (2) calculate the radiographic neck-shaft angle (NSA) of the prosthesis from 2-dimensional plane images using both anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs with high accuracy. Methods: Using a computer vision and pattern recognition algorithm, the femur shaft and prosthesis regions were identified, and their respective angles were extracted for NSA calculation. A neural network (NN) was then trained using clinician-generated AP radiograph NSAs as ground truths and AI-generated AP and lateral NSAs as features. Spearman's correlation and Kruskal-Wallis tests were calculated to explore any significant association between the final AI-generated and clinician-generated AP radiographic NSAs. Mean absolute error (MAE) and R-squared values were calculated with and without the NN model to identify the model's accuracy and variability. Results: There was a statistically significant correlation between the final AI-generated AP radiographic NSAs and the clinician-generated AP radiographic NSAs (r Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the identification of hip resurfacing prostheses using AI is feasible. By incorporating additional features such as the lateral NSA, the model can provide an accurate prediction of the AP radiographic NSA, closely approximating the ground truth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.