Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40521289›Full record

ReviewClinical kidney journal2025

10 tips to improve adherence to immunosuppressive medication after kidney transplantation.

Kassir Mahmood, Jude Allen, Rebecca Varley, Bernard Vrijens, Brooke M Huuskes, Alexander Woywodt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. CNI Trough Variability Does Not Reliably Reflect Medication Adherence: Insights From a 3-Year Follow-Up Study.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kassir MahmoodDepartment of Renal Medicine, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.
Jude AllenSpecialist Pharmacist, Northern Care Alliance, Salford, UK.
Rebecca VarleyDepartment of Renal and Pancreatic Transplantation, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Bernard VrijensChief Executive Officer, Advanced Analytical Research on Drug Exposure (AARDEX Group), Liege, Belgium.
Brooke M HuuskesTransplant patient and Centre of Cardiovascular Biology and Disease Research, Cardiorenal Division, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science (LIMS), La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Alexander WoywodtDepartment of Renal Medicine, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3825-6955

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-adherence is an issue in all chronic health conditions and the World Health Organization estimates that up to 50% of patients do not take all of their medications. The situation in kidney transplant patients is probably better, as these patients are preselected for good adherence and proactive behaviour. Nonetheless, non-adherence remains a common, significant and likely underdiagnosed problem in transplant nephrology. Not taking immunosuppressive medication as directed is strongly correlated with late acute rejection, which is often severe, leading to progressive loss of transplant function and poor outcomes overall. It is important to acknowledge that non-adherence is multifactorial and that interventions work best if clinicians understand risk factors and the causes of non-adherence in their patients. Reflex labelling of patients as non-adherent in documentation and clinic letters is unlikely to be helpful but good documentation is also important. It is also important to be aware of the phases of adherence and to have some knowledge of how to measure non-adherence. Dose simplification may help in some patients and technology can be employed to improve adherence, particularly in younger and information technology-literate patients. Peer support and patient information are also important. Individual assessment is important in patients who have lost a previous transplant due to non-adherence. We also emphasize the importance of a multidisciplinary approach and the relative paucity of robust data in this area. Based on the limited evidence and our individual and departmental experience, our 10 tips aim to provide clinicians with a toolbox of evidence-based interventions to address this important issue in daily clinical practice. We also provide a list of suggestions for institutions to address this important issue at departmental and institutional levels and suggest future research.

Indexed as

adherenceimmunosuppressionmedicationnon-adherencetransplantations

Identifiers

PMID40521289
PMCPMC12164751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.