ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Clinical characteristics and risk factors of esophageal reflux hypersensitivity: A multicenter study.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical characteristics and risk factors of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: A multicenter cross-sectional study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReflux hypersensitivity (RH) constitutes roughly 14% of patients with heartburn and 34% of those with refractory heartburn, yet it is inadequately comprehended.
aimTo investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with RH.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 109 patients with RH and 384 healthy controls from three medical centers between January 2022 and December 2023. Comprehensive data encompassing symptoms, motility, impedance-pH monitoring, and psychological evaluations were collected.
resultsRH patients encountered a greater frequency of weakly acidic reflux (WAR) events compared to acidic reflux or nonacidic reflux (NAR) events. Upright reflux time (1.22%) exceeds supine reflux time (0.54%) (
conclusionWAR and NAR are pivotal in RH. Patients with increased NAR are more likely to experience extraesophageal symptoms. Age, hiatal hernia, and anxiety are significant independent risk factors for RH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.