ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025
Image database with slides prepared by the Ziehl-Neelsen method for training automated detection and counting systems for tuberculosis bacilli.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We aim to provide a robust dataset for training automated systems to detect tuberculosis bacilli using Ziehl-Neelsen stained slides. By making this dataset available, a critical gap in the availability of public datasets that can be used for developing and testing artificial intelligence techniques for tuberculosis diagnosis is addressed. Our rationale is grounded in the urgent need for diagnostic tools that can enhance tuberculosis diagnosis quickly and efficiently, especially in resource-limited settings. Approach: The Ziehl-Neelsen method was used to prepare 362 slides, which were manually read. According to the World Health Organization's guidelines for performing bacilloscopy for tuberculosis diagnosis, experts annotated each slide to diagnose it as negative or positive. In addition, selected images underwent a detailed annotation process aimed at pinpointing the location of each bacillus and cluster within each image. Results: The database consists of three directories. The first contains all the images, separated by slide, and indicates whether it is negative or the number of crosses if positive, for each slide. The second directory contains the 502 images selected for training automated systems, with each bacillus's position annotated and the Python code used. All the image fragments (positive and negative patches) used in the models' training, validation, and testing stages are available in the third directory. Conclusions: The development of this annotated image database represents a significant advancement in tuberculosis diagnosis. By providing a high-quality and accessible resource to the scientific community, we enhance existing diagnostic tools and facilitate the development of automated technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.