ArticleAJOG global reports2025
Advanced abdominal pregnancy at a tertiary hospital in South Africa: a case series.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Successful placental removal guided by MRI-based mapping in advanced abdominal pregnancy: A case report and literature review.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- Advanced abdominal pregnancy secondary to tubal pregnancy: a rare case report and literature review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Review
- Advanced primary abdominal pregnancy with a live birth: a case report.Case reports in perinatal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvanced abdominal pregnancy occurs when the products of conception implant within the peritoneal cavity, external to the fallopian tubes and myometrium, beyond 20 weeks gestation. This is a rare condition that typically carries high maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity especially in low middle income countries.
objectiveTo describe the outcomes of advanced abdominal pregnancies over 14 years at a tertiary neonatal unit. STUDY
designThis case series retrospectively analyzed 17 extrauterine pregnancies at Groote Schuur Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. Seventeen mothers and 18 babies were included in the analysis. Data analysis focused on maternal history, risk factors, delivery complications, intraoperative findings, and neonatal outcomes. Microsoft StatPlus was used for statistical calculations.
resultsOf the 17 pregnancies, 16 were singleton births and one was a set of monochorionicmonoamniotic twins. In 14 cases (82.4%-14/17), the diagnosis was missed on the initial ultrasound scan. Sixteen (94.1%-16/17) deliveries were expedited within 48 hours of diagnosis. All deliveries were performed via open laparotomy under general anesthesia. There were 2 maternal deaths, and all cases involved at least 1 maternal complication. Thirteen (76.5%-13/17) placentae were implanted on multiple sites including the uterus, adnexa, omentum and bowel. Of the 18 babies, 12 (66.7%-12/18) were born alive, with 1 early and 1 late neonatal death. The median birth weight of live-born babies was 1313 grams (interquartile range: 970-2250 g). The median Apgar score was 5 (interquartile range: 3-6) at 1 minute and 7 (interquartile range: 4-8) at 5 minutes. Two (16.7%-2/12) babies had transient cranial asymmetry. The median length of hospital stay for the ten babies discharged home was 32 days (interquartile range: 19-41 days).
conclusionAdvanced abdominal pregnancies, when detected early and managed at well-resourced tertiary hospitals, can result in favorable outcomes. This is the first case series from a low- and middle-income country demonstrating such positive neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.