Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40521214›Full record

Review3 Biotech2025

Holistic transition in the anaerobic digestion: influences of multiple process controls on the methane enrichment.

Vignesh Natarajan, G L Karthik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in 3 Biotech, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vignesh NatarajanSchool of Biosciences Engineering and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology Bhopal University, Kotri Kalan, Sehore District, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 466114 India.ORCID 0009-0000-5601-2260
G L KarthikSchool of Biosciences Engineering and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology Bhopal University, Kotri Kalan, Sehore District, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 466114 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic wastes primarily generates biogas, an accessible bioenergy resource. The process is straightforward; however, complexity increases at elevated organic loading rates. For instance, the methane yield decreases by 3.5-fold when the organic loading exceeds 8%. The instability of the microbial population structure contributes to challenges in the process. The development of robust microbial consortia offers flexibility in the removal of toxic gases, achieving a 97% removal rate of hydrogen sulfide while also enriching methane gas. The modern real-time monitoring of biogas using microbial fuel cells enhances the accuracy in the determination of volatile fatty acid concentrations (> 7.87 mM), biogas productivity (0.35-0.4 L/h), and methane yield (558 mL methane/g volatile solids). This review paper aims to cover the fundamental aspects of process controls in the biogas generation system. In addition, the paper distinguishes the key measurements needed for AD stability from the various process adjustments for AD upgradation. For instance, measurement of volatile fatty acids by a dissolved hydrogen sensor prevents AD failure. In contrast, employing a helical impeller enhances the productivity of methane. Furthermore, case studies on the application of zerovalent iron nanoparticles, biochar, and bioaugmentation for biogas production have been discussed in detail. Interestingly, the combination of AD upgradation with real-time monitoring elevates the biogas yield (80% increase) and methane content (2.3-fold increase) and improves the process sustainability.

Indexed as

AdditivesAnaerobic digestionBiogasMethaneVolatile fatty acids

Identifiers

PMID40521214
PMCPMC12165935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.