Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40521105›Full record

ArticleNature. Mental health2025

Chronic loneliness and isolation phenotypes, incident functional impairment and mortality in England between 2004 and 2018.

Qian Gao, Andrew Steptoe, Daisy Fancourt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature. Mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qian GaoSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6906-1771
Andrew SteptoeDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7808-4943
Daisy FancourtDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6952-334X

Funding

Project-001R01AG017644 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF LONDON INST OF NEUROLOGY · PI Andrew Steptoe · 2000 to 2026
$56.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social deficits are potential risk factors for premature mortality. Most research has focused on social deficits measured at single points in time. It remains unclear if the chronicity of loneliness affects its impact on adverse health outcomes. This study assessed the effects of chronic loneliness and isolation in predicting incident functional impairment and all-cause and cause-specific mortality. This longitudinal study used panel data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, including 14 years of follow-up (waves 2-9, in 2004-2018). Social deficits over three waves (4 years) were measured using the UCLA loneliness scale and social isolation index, categorized as not present, fluctuating or chronic. We estimated the all-cause mortality risk with Cox proportional hazard modeling, and the Fine-Gray competing risk modeling was used to test the risk of functional impairment onset and cause-specific mortality. We analyzed 5,131 participants (mean age 67.6 years (s.d. 9.8)) in the mortality cohort (follow-up 9.8 years (IQR: 6.67-10.08)) and 4,279 participants (mean age 67.0 years (s.d. 9.6)) who were functional disability-free at baseline (follow-up 9.8 years (IQR: 7.17-10.17)). Compared with not being lonely/isolated, there was a higher risk of incident functional impairment among those with fluctuating loneliness (sub-hazard ratio (sHR) 1.30, 95% CI: 1.03-1.63) and chronic loneliness (sHR 1.58, 1.12-2.23), as well as chronic social isolation (sHR 1.41, 1.02-1.94). In survival analyses, compared with people who were not lonely/isolated, people experiencing fluctuating loneliness and social isolation had higher risks of all-cause mortality (loneliness HR 1.29, 1.13-1.48; isolation HR 1.15, 1.01-1.31). People with chronic isolation also had higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR 1.27, 1.05-1.55) and cancer-related mortality (sHR 1.69, 1.23-2.31). Over a 14 year follow-up, we found that chronic loneliness and isolation phenotypes were associated with aggravated risks of incident functional impairment and mortality. There was a potential dose-response relationship between chronicity of loneliness phenotypes and functional impairment onset and mortality. Preventing the onset of and transition to chronic loneliness and isolation in older age is a crucial target to support both the healthspan and the lifespan.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyPublic health

Identifiers

PMID40521105
PMCPMC12165843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.