ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Challenges and future perspectives in using mesenchymal stem cells for efficient bone fracture healing.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fracture healing: from molecular and cellular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Biochemical and Physicomechanical Cues of Biomaterials Guide Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Impact of Beta-Blocker Therapy for Cardiovascular Diseases on Bone Healing Following Fracture Surgery.Calcified tissue international · 2026Review
- Bone‑origin repair in diabetic foot ulcers: Mechanisms of callus formation and endocrine effects in healing (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Alveolar socket preservation with human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-seeded hydroxyapatite-chitosan scaffolds: An in vivo assessment of osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB expression.Journal of molecular histology · 2026Article
- Orthobiologics in Trauma: Current Trends, Future Directions, and Regenerative Strategies.Cureus · 2026Review
- Granulate-to-Filament: An Extrusion-Mixed PLA-Human Bone Material System for 3D-Printed Bone Scaffolds.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Managing Bone Infections Beyond Systemic Antibiotics: A Scoping Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Intradermal Application of Allogenic Wharton's Jelly Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Chronic Post-Thoracotomy Wound in an Elderly Patient After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Clinical Case with Brief Literature Review.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neuro-immune-vascular-stem cell crosstalk in bone/cartilage regeneration: mechanisms, technological advances, and clinical perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- TSG-6 promotes healing of critical-sized bone defects in mice.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Synergistic Wnt/BMP Co-activation accelerates osteogenic differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells via paraxial mesoderm induction.Journal of tissue engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) demonstrate considerable potential for enhancing bone fracture healing due to their multipotency and immunomodulatory properties. This review investigates the relationship between MSCs, the immune system, and the skeletal microenvironment, focusing on the roles of cytokines and signaling pathways in osteogenesis. The healing process of bone fractures is complex and involves a coordinated response from various cell types, including immune cells and MSCs, which secrete bioactive molecules that promote tissue regeneration and modulate inflammation. Despite their promise, challenges such as variability in MSC sources, ethical considerations, regulatory restrictions, and obstacles in achieving effective delivery and retention at fracture sites restrict their clinical application. Recent advancements in MSC-based therapies, including innovative biomaterials, three-dimensional bioprinting, and gene editing technologies, aim to improve the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs. In addition, strategies to rejuvenate aged MSCs and enhance their regenerative capabilities are critical for addressing age-related fractures, as the functionality of MSCs declines with age. Understanding the mechanisms underlying MSC action, including their paracrine signaling and interaction with the bone microenvironment, is essential for optimizing their therapeutic use. Addressing existing limitations in MSC research and application provides a comprehensive perspective on the future of MSC therapies in bone repair. This review discusses the transformative potential of MSCs in regenerative medicine and orthopedics, highlighting the need for further research to unlock their full capabilities and improve clinical outcomes in patients with bone injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.