Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40521090›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

Mechanical properties of 3D voxel-printed materials for cardiovascular tissue imitation.

Joël Illi, Manuel Bergamin, Marc Ilic, Anselm W Stark, Stefan Bracher, Martin Hofmann, Juergen Burger, Isaac Shiri, Andreas Haeberlin, Christoph Gräni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joël IlliDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Manuel BergaminDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Marc IlicDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Anselm W StarkDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Stefan BracherARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Martin HofmannSchool of Biomedical and Precision Engineering, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Juergen BurgerSchool of Biomedical and Precision Engineering, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Isaac ShiriDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Andreas HaeberlinDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Christoph GräniDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular patient-specific phantoms can improve patient care through testing and simulation. However, materials like silicone and 3D-printing polymers differ mechanically from biological tissues. Agilus30 Clear, the primary material for 3D-printed phantoms, is much stiffer, nearly isotropic, and lacks strain-hardening behavior. To overcome these challenges, a novel 3D voxel-printing approach may provide an effective solution. Methods/aim: This study aimed to explore the applicability of 3D voxel printing, assess how different parameters (strand structure, density, and orientation) affect mechanical properties, and compare them to established phantom materials and porcine cardiovascular tissues. Progressive uniaxial cyclic tension tests were performed across nine stages, varying strain rates and target strain levels, with elastic modulus calculated for comparison. The goal was to stepwise assess whether the overall material stiffness can be reduced, achieving anisotropy and replicating strain-hardening behavior. Results: In the first step, varying the strand density, the tested samples showed a 0%-60% strain modulus of elasticity of 0.215-0.278 N/mm Conclusion: The novel 3D voxel-printing material approach resulted in reduced elastic modulus, anisotropic behavior, and strain-hardening properties, providing a much closer representation of the mechanical behavior of porcine cardiovascular tissues compared to other available phantom materials. However, there is still significant potential for optimization through further exploration of fiber recruitment replication.

Indexed as

3D-printingadditive manufacturingartificial cardiovascular tissuecardiovascular phantomsnon-linear material mechanicspatient-specific phantomsuniaxial tensile testvoxel-printing

Identifiers

PMID40521090
PMCPMC12162977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.