ArticleEco-Environment & Health2025
Synergistic strategies for pollution and carbon emission reduction in China's wastewater treatment: A comprehensive tiered assessment and benchmarking framework.
Article in Eco-Environment & Health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
China's dual-carbon goals challenges wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), requiring integrated pollution control and carbon emission reduction. Critical gaps hinder China's strategies for WWTPs, particularly in identifying upgrade needs, optimizing performance, and assessing the local benchmark plants as references. This study addresses these gaps through greenhouse gas (GHG) emission accounting and impact factor analysis, using monthly data from 2232 WWTPs across China. A tiered assessment methodology was developed to evaluate the synergy between pollution reduction and carbon mitigation, including indicators, methodologies, and assessment criteria. Results indicate that indirect emissions from electricity and chemical consumption accounted for 59.9% of total GHG emissions. Key factors influencing these indirect emissions included plant scale, treatment processes, geographic area, operational load, electricity consumption, and influent quality. Through the tiered assessment, WWTPs were classified into three categories: priority control (861 plants), general control (730 plants), and maintenance (641 plants). Furthermore, 222 benchmark plants were identified as exhibiting optimal synergy between pollution control and carbon reduction. For 80% of the benchmark plants, the ranges for carbon emission intensity, influent COD, influent C/N ratio, electricity consumption intensity, and operating load were 0.258-0.482 kg CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.