ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
Simplified computed tomography pulmonary angiography score predicts clinical deterioration in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic Value of CT-Derived Indicators of Right-Heart Strain and Thrombus Burden for In-Hospital Adverse Events in Acute Pulmonary Embolism.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Currently, simplified methods based on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) to predict clinical deterioration in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) are lacking. We developed a simplified imaging model with good clinical accessibility to predict this outcome. Study design and methods: Patients with acute pulmonary embolism from 2008 to 2019 were retrospectively enrolled from two medical centers to form a study cohort and a validation cohort. Seven models of pulmonary artery obstruction index (PAOI) were developed based on the location and degree of obstruction. The outcome of interest was clinical deterioration during hospitalization. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between different models and clinical deterioration. The category-free net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to quantify improvements in predictability. Results: The study group included 210 patients (mean age: 65 ± 16 years; male: 40 %) and the external validation group included 109 patients (mean age: 64 ± 17 years; male: 43 %). Calculating the nearly total obstruction of 20 peripheral arteries demonstrated good predictive ability (AUC: 0.77). Total obstruction of six peripheral arteries did not increase the odds of clinical deterioration, while total obstruction of ten peripheral arteries nearly doubled the risk of deterioration. Combining PAOI with the simplified pulmonary embolism severity index (sPESI) improved the predictive ability for clinical deterioration compared to using sPESI alone (NRI: 0.09-0.12; IDI: 0.05-0.09). Conclusion: Calculating totally obstructed pulmonary arteries simplifies the prediction of clinical deterioration. The combination of PAOI and sPESI enhances the ability to predict clinical deterioration in patients with acute PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.