ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025
Dental hygienists' practices and perceptions towards human papillomavirus vaccination: A cross-sectional study in California.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The National Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Roundtable urges dental professionals to recommend HPV vaccination for eligible patients. Therefore, this study examined 1) how commonly dental hygienists recommended the HPV vaccine to age-eligible patients, and 2) the factors related to the HPV vaccine recommendation. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we distributed an online survey to California Dental Hygienists' Association members. The survey data were collected from August to October 2023. Questions were asked about whether they recommended the HPV vaccine for age-eligible individuals and their opinions on recommending the vaccine. We utilized univariate, bivariate, and logistic regression models for our analysis. Results: Only 18 % recommended the HPV vaccine. Nearly 42 % said they lacked time, 60 % lacked sufficient information, and 48 % were unaware of guidelines for counseling on HPV vaccination. Many respondents were uncomfortable (34 %) or unsure (30 %) about recommending the HPV vaccine. Almost 57 % thought they were appropriate healthcare professionals to educate and counsel on HPV-related issues. Those who worked in a dental practice that served all age patients, those who discussed the relationship between HPV and oral cancer, and those with more favorable opinions and attitudes about recommending the HPV vaccine were more likely to recommend the HPV vaccine. Conclusion: Most respondents said they or their team did not recommend the HPV vaccine to eligible patients. Negative views on HPV and the vaccine influenced their recommendation intent. Dental hygienists should stay updated on national HPV vaccination guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.