ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2025
Mechanically assisted non-invasive ventilation for liver SABR: Improve CBCT, treat more accurately.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanically-assisted non-invasive deep inspiration breath-hold (MANIV-DIBH): A first clinical application in paediatric radiotherapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) during liver stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is degraded by respiratory motion artefacts, potentially jeopardising treatment accuracy. Mechanically assisted non-invasive ventilation-induced breath-hold (MANIV-BH) can reduce these artefacts. This study compares MANIV-BH and free-breathing CBCTs regarding image quality, IGRT variability, automatic registration accuracy, and deep-learning auto-segmentation performance. Materials and methods: Liver SABR CBCTs were presented blindly to 14 operators: 25 patients with FB and 25 with MANIV-BH. They rated CBCT quality and IGRT ease (rigid registration with planning CT). Interoperator IGRT variability was compared between FB and MANIV-BH. Automatic gross tumour volume (GTV) mapping accuracy was compared using automatic rigid registration and image-guided deformable registration. Deep-learning organ-at-risk (OAR) auto-segmentation was rated by an operator, who recorded the time dedicated for manual correction of these volumes. Results: MANIV-BH significantly improved CBCT image quality ("Excellent"/"Good": 83.4 % versus 25.4 % with FB, p < 0.001), facilitated IGRT ("Very easy"/"Easy": 68.0 % versus 38.9 % with FB, p < 0.001), and reduced IGRT variability, particularly for trained operators (overall variability of 3.2 mm versus 4.6 mm with FB, p = 0.010). MANIV-BH improved deep-learning auto-segmentation performance (80.0 % rated "Excellent"/"Good" versus 4.0 % with FB, p < 0.001), and reduced median manual correction time by 54.2 % compared to FB (p < 0.001). However, automatic GTV mapping accuracy was not significantly different between MANIV-BH and FB. Conclusion: In liver SABR, MANIV-BH significantly improves CBCT quality, reduces interoperator IGRT variability, and enhances OAR auto-segmentation. Beyond being safe and effective for respiratory motion mitigation, MANIV increases accuracy during treatment delivery, although its implementation requires resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.