ArticleJAACAP open2025
Performance and Psychometric Properties of Novel Brief Assessments for Depression in Children and Adolescents.
Article in JAACAP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00612313 (Pediatric MDD), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pediatric MDD: Sequential Treatment With Fluoxetine and Relapse Prevention
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of the Brief Children's Depression Rating Scale in Children Treated With Selegiline Transdermal Patch vs Placebo.JAACAP open · 2026Article
- A scoping review of adult NCD-relevant phenotypes measured in today's large child cohort studies.Pediatric research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Current rating scales for depressive symptom severity in pediatric patients do not meet the needs of contemporary clinical practice and research. This study sought to evaluate relative performance and psychometric properties of the 5-item Brief Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (BCDRS-R5), as well as the clinician-rated and self-report versions of the 5-item Very Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (VQIDS-A5-C and VQIDS-A5-SR, respectively). Method: This study examined a sample of 165 outpatients aged 8 to 17 years with major depressive disorder who were treated openly with fluoxetine for 6 weeks from a prior National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)-funded study. We examined the internal consistency, scale dimensionality, relative performance in detecting remission and response, and sensitivity to change of each 5-item scale. Results: All 3 brief scales had good-to-excellent internal consistency. Cronbach coefficient α values were 0.687 to 0.795 at baseline and 0.766 to 0.844 at week 6. Principal component analysis suggested a 1-factor solution for each scale. The BCDRS-R5 demonstrated a greater degree of accuracy in identifying response and remission compared to the VQIDS-A5-C and VQIDS-A5-SR. The scales were sensitive to change in symptom severity over 6 weeks of acute treatment with fluoxetine. Conclusion: Three novel, brief scales assessing depressive symptom severity in pediatric patients showed similar performance and sensitivity to change in symptom severity over 6 weeks of acute treatment when compared with longer, standard scales. Clinical trial registration information: Sequential Treatment of Pediatric MDD to Increase Remission and Prevent Relapse; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00612313.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.