ArticleJAACAP open2025
Identifying Cardiovascular Disease Risk Endotypes of Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder Using Exploratory Unsupervised Machine Learning.
Article in JAACAP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing heart disease prediction with stacked ensemble and MCDM-based ranking: an optimized RST-ML approach.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD) are at increased risk of premature atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD). The ability to identify adolescents with MDD who are at increased CVD risk would facilitate personalized interventions and advance knowledge regarding the MDD-CVD association. This study aimed to identify adolescent MDD endotypes of increased CVD risk. Method: Youth with MDD (n = 189; 74% female; mean [SD] age 15.03 [1.85] years) were recruited through an outpatient psychiatry program in a large urban hospital. Individual and family (demographics, depression, anxiety symptoms, family conflict), physical examination (vital signs, body mass index), and laboratory (lipid profile, glucose, C-reactive protein) data were collected. Using demographic, clinical, and laboratory data, k-means clustering was performed; a subsequent model included only lipids. Continuous and categorical measures were compared between clusters. Results: The model containing all variables yielded 1 high and 1 low CVD risk cluster, which differed significantly in ethnicity, anthropometrics, laboratory data, and family conflict, but not in depression or anxiety severity. The lipid-only model yielded 2 high and 2 low CVD risk clusters that differed significantly in sex, ethnicity, body mass index, lipids, depression, and anxiety severity. Of the 2 CVD risk clusters, one was indicative of increased cardiometabolic risk, while the other comprised adolescents with MDD who had high low-density lipoprotein and no other cardiovascular risk factors. Conclusion: Endotypes of adolescent MDD associated with varying levels of CVD risk were identified. Results highlight the heterogeneity of adolescent MDD and the need for precision medicine approaches in management of MDD to improve both CVD and depression outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.