Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40520965›Full record

ReviewOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025

Plant protection, the Cinderella of the one health strategy?

Giacomo Lorenzini, Cristina Nali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Giacomo LorenziniDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment of the University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Cristina NaliDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment of the University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant and microbiome health are fundamental to life on Earth, human well-being, and planetary health, yet their importance is often underestimated. Human and animal health depend on plant health for food security (nutritious food production, economic growth), food safety (contamination risks), ecosystem services (air quality, mental health benefits), and mitigating antimicrobial resistance (from agricultural antibiotic use). Plant health specialists are crucial for plant health, food security, and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals within a One Health framework. Plant diseases and pests can significantly impact food production, economic stability, and public health. To address these challenges, we need to integrate plant health into the One Health framework. This requires collaboration between plant scientists, veterinarians, human health experts, and environmental scientists. By working together, we can develop more sustainable and holistic approaches to agriculture and public health.

Indexed as

Agenda 2030Antimicrobial resistanceEcosystem servicesFood safetyFood securityPhytopathology

Identifiers

PMID40520965
PMCPMC12163416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.