ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Biomimicry as a decision-making methodology in condition monitoring.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving Primary Healthcare: Applying Grapevine (Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biomimetics as a Functional Engineering Framework for Mechanical Systems: A PRISMA-Guided Systematic Mapping of Sensing, Inspection, Access Robotics, and Condition Monitoring (2016-2026).Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In maintenance engineering, effective decision-making is critical to ensuring system reliability and operational efficiency. Modern industrial systems are monitored by a multitude of sensors that generate large volumes of data. However, traditional condition monitoring techniques face several limitations: they rely heavily on high-quality, continuous sensor input, struggle with adaptability to new fault scenarios, require significant computational resources, and often provide limited decision support beyond fault detection. These constraints hinder their practical utility in dynamic and resource-constrained environments. This paper introduces a biomimetics-inspired framework for condition management, drawing on principles observed in natural systems to overcome the aforementioned challenges. Biomimetics, an emerging interdisciplinary field, has shown significant promise in bridging gaps between theoretical innovation and practical industrial application. However, its potential remains underutilized in maintenance decision-making systems. In response, our study proposes a biologically inspired methodology that parallels the human cognitive system, integrating multi-sensory data, adaptive learning, and energy-efficient sensing mechanisms to enhance fault diagnosis and decision-making. The core contributions of this research are fourfold: (1) adaptive intelligence through continuous learning that revises rules and cases over time; (2) multi-sensory integration, inspired by animal sensory systems, to improve diagnostic accuracy; (3) data augmentation techniques that address issues of incomplete or noisy input; and (4) the introduction of energy-efficient sensors and biomimetic optimization strategies suitable for IoT and edge devices. To demonstrate the practical applicability of our approach, we conducted empirical studies using vibration data for procedural analytics, validating the framework's effectiveness in real-world fault diagnosis. It serves as a functional roadmap, inviting broader discussion on the integration of biomimetics in maintenance engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.