ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2025
Machine learning-based radiomics analysis in enhancing CT for predicting pathological subtypes and WHO staging of thymic epithelial tumors: a multicenter study.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-modal prediction model for thymic epithelial tumors: Enhancing surgical decisions and recurrence risk assessment from CT datasets.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- An interpretable machine learning approach using nnU-Net-based radiomics for preoperative risk stratification of thymic epithelial tumors: a multicenter study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Advancements in artificial intelligence for cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction: current applications and emerging opportunities.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Fusion of machine learning models using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation for thymoma risk prediction: a multicenter analysis.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study is aimed to develop predictive models for classifying thymic epithelial tumor (TET) histological subtypes (A/AB/B1, B2/B3, C) and WHO stages (I-IV) using radiomics features derived from contrast-enhanced CT scans. These models were validated on multicenter external datasets to improve preoperative diagnosis and guide treatment decisions. A total of 257 patients diagnosed with TET between January 2013 and April 2024 were retrospectively analyzed, with 181 cases from the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University served as the training cohort and 76 cases from the Second Affiliated Hospital used as an external test set. All patients underwent preoperative enhanced CT scans. After manual segmentation of the volume of interest (VOI), 1,038 radiomic features were extracted. Feature selection was performed using PCA and LASSO methods. Three models (clinical semantic, radiomics, and a fusion model combining both) were built using random forest algorithms. The fusion model achieved the highest performance in the external test set, with an accuracy of 0.908 and F1 score of 0.896 for histological subtype classification, and an accuracy of 0.803 and F1 score of 0.833 for WHO staging. The radiomics model shows slightly lower performance, while the clinical semantic model performs the weakest. Our findings suggest that machine learning models integrating radiomics and clinical features can effectively predict TET subtypes and stages, offering a non-invasive tool for accurate preoperative assessment with strong generalization ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.