Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40520824›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Genetics2025

Genotype-Phenotype Association for 14

Albee Messing, Amy Tara Waldman, Daniel M Bolt

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Albee MessingWaisman Center and Department of Comparative Biosciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6049-0521
Amy Tara WaldmanDivision of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1054-0815
Daniel M BoltDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7593-4439

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Alexander disease is a rare monogenic disorder caused by dominant variants in Methods: We compiled a list of variants in Results: Fourteen variants met our criteria for detailed analysis (10 with 7 or more unrelated cases and 4 additional variants involving 2 of the most commonly affected amino acids, R79 and R239) derived from a total of 231 cases. The variants seem to fall into 3 distinct groups-some with consistent early onsets (N77S, R79C and R79L, and most of the R239s), some with consistent late onsets (R70W and N386S), and some with more variable onsets (R416W). Pairwise comparison results found that R239H was associated with significantly earlier onsets than R239C. We found similar groupings for survival. Finally, we evaluated sex as a potential modifying factor for either age at onset or survival but found no significant association. Discussion: Genotype-phenotype correlations do exist in Alexander disease, at least for a limited number of GFAP variants for which sufficient numbers of individual cases can be identified to allow valid statistical analysis.

Identifiers

PMID40520824
PMCPMC12166557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.