ArticleJHLT open2025
Outcomes with venoarterial vs venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation in interstitial lung disease.
Article in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evidence on outcomes associated with venoarterial (VA) versus venovenous (VV) of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to lung transplantation (LTx) in interstitial lung disease (ILD) is limited. Methods: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) registry, we conducted a retrospective cohort study on ILD patients bridged with ECMO for LTx. Outcomes by cannulation type (VV vs VA) were analyzed, with 1:1 propensity matching to reduce selection bias. Results: Among 1,551 patients, 1,236 (79.7%) were on VV ECMO and 315 (20.3%) on VA ECMO. Delisting due to death or deterioration was higher with VA ECMO in both the overall (41% vs 27%, Conclusions: VV ECMO was associated with a more successful bridge to LTx than VA ECMO. Adjusted post-transplant outcomes were comparable. Prospective studies are warranted to explore outcome differences by cannulation strategy in ILD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.