Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40520811›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2025

Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy for Single-Segment Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: A Retrospective Study with Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up.

Xiangbin Wang, Tao Li, Yong Li, Yubin Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiangbin Wang *Department of Spinal Surgery, Shaoyang Central Hospital, Shaoyang, Hunan, 422000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8068-2616
Tao Li *Department of Spine Surgery and Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3877-2749
Yong LiDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Shaoyang Central Hospital, Shaoyang, Hunan, 422000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0000-8482-0978
Yubin LongDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Shaoyang Central Hospital, Shaoyang, Hunan, 422000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0000-9380-5577

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (P-PECD) has been increasingly used for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR), while few studies have reported on its medium-long-term outcomes. This study aims to investigate the medium-long-term efficacy and imaging findings of P-PECD in the treatment of single-segment CSR. Methods: The data of 51 patients with single-segment CSR treated with P-PECD were retrospectively analyzed. Efficacy was evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) scores of neck and arm, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and modified Macnab criteria. Radiologic parameters were measured before and after the operation, including cervical Cobb angle, range of motion (ROM), intervertebral space height, as well as horizontal and angular displacement at the operative level. Results: The VAS scores of neck and arm, JOA score, and NDI were significantly improved postoperatively compared with those before the operation, and the differences were statistically significant ( Conclusion: P-PECD for single-segment CSR has the advantages of less trauma, less bleeding, a low complication rate, faster postoperative recovery, and less impact on cervical mobility and stability, which has excellent medium-long-term efficacy.

Indexed as

cervical spondylotic radiculopathydiscectomyminimally invasivepercutaneous endoscopic

Identifiers

PMID40520811
PMCPMC12165176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.