ArticleJournal of pain research2025
Exploring Racial Disparities in Chronic Pain Management.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Scoping review of equity considerations in digitally enabled patient education interventions for self-managing chronic musculoskeletal pain.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Integrating Nonpharmacologic Strategies for Pain with Inclusion, Respect, and Equity (INSPIRE): Cultural and linguistic tailoring for a digital health intervention.Internet interventions · 2026Article
- "CARING in Action": A Knowledge Mobilization Project on Co-Creating Evidence-Based Communication Training in Chronic Pain Care for Healthcare Professionals.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Addressing racial disparities in chronic pain management referrals and prescribing is critical for ensuring equitable healthcare outcomes. Understanding these disparities is crucial for developing effective, patient-centered treatment strategies. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional retrospective study of 19,919 patients diagnosed with chronic non-cancer pain between 7/1/2020 and 7/1/2022 was conducted at a major academic medical center. Patients' demographics, pain types, and treatment modalities were analyzed using chi-square tests and logistic regression models to evaluate racial differences in pain management referrals and opioid prescriptions. Results: Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and Hispanic patients had significantly lower odds of receiving interventional pain (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.72 and 0.40, respectively) and neurosurgical referrals (OR = 0.66 and 0.49, respectively) compared to Non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients. Conversely, NHB patients were more likely to receive orthopedic surgery (OR = 1.40) and physical therapy referrals (OR = 1.16). Additionally, both NHB and Hispanic patients had lower odds of receiving opioid therapy (OR = 0.75 and 0.47, respectively) compared to NHW patients. Conclusion: This study highlights significant racial disparities in chronic pain management, with NHB and Hispanic patients receiving fewer referrals to specialist care and lower opioid prescription rates compared to NHW patients. Strategies to address these disparities include provider education on implicit bias, cultural sensitivity training, and ensuring equitable access to healthcare resources. Further research is needed to explore the root causes of these disparities and develop targeted interventions to improve healthcare equity for all patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.