ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Management strategies for CAR-T cell therapy-related toxicities: results from a survey in Greece.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Longitudinal Cognitive Assessment After CAR-T Cell Immunotherapy: A Prospective Cohort Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- CAR T-cells in hematologic malignancies: Advances, challenges, and future directions.iScience · 2026Review
- CAR T-Cell Immunotherapy in Neuroautoimmune Diseases: Focus on the Central Nervous System.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has transformed the management of relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies, offering remarkable remission rates. However, severe toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), are posing challenges to patient care. This multicenter observational study evaluated the prophylactic and treatment strategies for managing severe CRS and ICANS across six transplant centers in Greece. Data from 173 adult patients receiving CAR-T cell products-axi-cel, tisa-cel, and brexu-cel-were analyzed. The incidence of grade 3 CRS was 6.6% for axi-cel, 3.3% for tisa-cel, and 10% for brexu-cel recipients. Grade 4 CRS was documented in 2.5% and 5% in axi-cel and brexu-cel recipients, while grade 5 CRS was recorder only in brexu-cel (10%). Severe ICANS was less frequent, with grade 3 and 4 rates of 7.5% and 2.5% for axi-cel, while brexu-cel documented only grade 3 (10%). Centers utilized prophylactic measures, including levetiracetam and low-dose dexamethasone, significantly reducing severe toxicities. Tocilizumab was administered for CRS management, supplemented by anakinra or siltuximab in select cases. Early intervention strategies effectively minimized progression to severe toxicity. Our findings underscore the importance of standardized prophylactic and therapeutic protocols in mitigating CAR-T-related toxicities. The variability in toxicity incidence reflects differences in patient populations, CAR-T constructs, and clinical practices. Further research is essential to optimize individualized management strategies and advance the safety of CAR-T therapies in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.