Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40520689›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025

Patient recall of postoperative protocols following hand surgery does not differ by information provider: a randomized clinical trial.

Dhruv Mendiratta, Rohan Singh, Aleksandra McGrath

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03893968 (Are Doctors and Assistant Nurses Equally Good at Informing Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03893968 nacompletednot on this map

Are Doctors and Assistant Nurses Equally Good at Informing Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Information Recall Regarding Postoperative Self-care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUmeå UniversityRan2018 to 2018Enrolled72ConditionsPatient CareArmsInformation by an assistant nurse, Information by a doctor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dhruv MendirattaDepartment of Orthopaedics, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, United States.
Rohan SinghDepartment of Orthopaedics, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, United States.
Aleksandra McGrathDepartment of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Västerbotten, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding of postoperative care is limited in patients who undergo ambulatory surgery. This study compares patients' recall of information regarding postoperative self-care when being verbally informed by either a surgeon or assistant nurse postoperatively prior to discharge. Secondary objectives for this study are to compare differences in patients' level of "feeling that they understood the information", stress, and satisfaction. A non-blinded randomized single-center controlled trial was conducted at a hand surgical unit in Northern Sweden (Trial Registration ID: NCT03893968). Patients were randomized into a control (surgeon) or intervention group (assistant nurse). Patients were asked seven questions about postoperative self-care one week postoperatively via telephone call, yielding a maximum score of seven points. Thirty-nine patients were informed by assistant nurses, and thirty-three patients were informed by surgeons. There was no difference in recall between the two groups (4.95 vs. 5.15,

Indexed as

clinical trialhand surgeryhealthcare literacypatient carepostoperative recall

Identifiers

PMID40520689
PMCPMC12162562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.