ArticleInternational journal of analytical chemistry2025
A LC-MS/MS Assay for Quantification of Amodiaquine and Desethylamodiaquine in Dried Blood Spots on Filter Paper.
Article in International journal of analytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artesunate-amodiaquine (ARS-AQ) is a first-line antimalarial treatment recommended by the World Health Organization. AQ is the long acting partner drug in this combination, and therapeutic success is correlated with the terminal exposure to AQ. Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling for AQ is a convenient and minimally invasive technique, especially suitable for clinical studies in resource limited settings and pediatric studies. Our primary aim was to develop and validate a bioanalytical method for quantification of AQ and its active metabolite in capillary blood applied onto filter paper as a DBS sample. The separation was achieved using a reverse phase column (Zorbax SB-CN 50 × 4.6 mm, I.D. 3.5 μm) and a mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile:ammonium formate 20 mM with 0.5% formic acid (15:85, v/v). A 50 μL DBS was punctured with five 3.2 mm punches from the filter paper, and the punches collected correspond to approximately 15 μL of dried blood. The blood was then extracted using a mixture of 0.5% formic acid in water:acetonitrile (50:50, v/v), along with stable isotope-labeled internal standards (AQ-D10 and desethylamodiaquine [DAQ]-D5). Mass spectrometry was used for quantification over the range of 2.03-459 ng/mL for AQ and 3.13-1570 ng/mL for DAQ. The validation of the method was carried out in compliance with regulatory requirements. The intra- and interbatch precisions were below 15% and passed all validation acceptance criteria. No carryover and no matrix effects were detected. Normalized matrix factors (analyte/internal standard) ranged from 0.96 to 1.03 for all analytes, hence no matrix effects. AQ and DAQ were stable in all conditions evaluated. Long-term stability in DBS samples was demonstrated for up to 10 years when stored at -80°C and for 15 months when stored at room temperature. The developed method was demonstrated to be reliable and accurate. This assay may be particularly useful in the context of resource limited settings and in pediatric field studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.