Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40520657›Full record

ReviewBiochemia medica2025

Post-exercise creatine kinase variability: a literature review.

Vanja Radišić Biljak, Anja Lazić, Ana Nikler, Damir Pekas, Andrea Saračević, Nebojša Trajković

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemia medica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The effect ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vanja Radišić BiljakDepartment of Medical Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital "Sveti Duh", Zagreb, Croatia.
Anja LazićFaculty of sport and physical education, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia.
Ana NiklerDepartment of Medical Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital "Sveti Duh", Zagreb, Croatia.
Damir PekasUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of Kinesiology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Andrea SaračevićDepartment of Medical Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital "Sveti Duh", Zagreb, Croatia.
Nebojša TrajkovićFaculty of sport and physical education, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Creatine kinase (CK) activity has been generally considered as reliable blood marker for assessing muscle function, damage, and repair. However, the greatest challenge in the interpretation of CK activity remains the high variability in CK increase in relation to degrees of muscle cell damage or disturbance. Several known contributors to CK variability have been identified. The most important include the type of training, exercise intensity, gender differences, body composition, intra- and interindividual biological variability, as well as preanalytical and analytical considerations. Creatine kinase variability following different types of exercise reflects the complex interplay between exercise modality, intensity, individual physiology, and recovery strategies. High-intensity exercises, especially those involving eccentric muscle contractions, tend to produce more significant CK responses due to greater muscle fiber disruption. Gender differences in CK variability are pronounced, with men generally exhibiting higher CK activities following exercise compared to women. Creatine kinase variability is also closely linked to body composition, with muscle mass generally leading to higher CK activities post-exercise, while higher body fat may correlate with lower CK responses. Regarding preanalytical and analytical considerations, perhaps the greatest challenge in CK measurement is the limited sample stability, which should always be taken into consideration when analyzing CK activity in stored samples for research or clinical purposes. This review, through exploring all of the above-mentioned sources of CK variability, could facilitate the development of evidence-based practices for preventing overuse injuries, and promoting long-term athlete health and well-being.

Indexed as

Creatine KinaseExerciseBiomarkersBody CompositionFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalBiomarkersCreatine Kinasecreatine kinaseexercisesports medicinevariability

Identifiers

PMID40520657
PMCPMC12161516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.