ReviewBiochemia medica2025
Post-exercise creatine kinase variability: a literature review.
Review in Biochemia medica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of polyphenol-rich interventions on the time-course of muscle recovery and athletic performance following exercise-induced muscle damage: a three-level meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative effects of plant-derived anthocyanin- and flavanol-rich supplements on recovery outcomes after exercise-induced muscle damage: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- The effect ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Time-course of muscular stress and fatigue markers following different soccer small-sided games: evidence from a randomized crossover study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Trial
- Effects of a Taekwondo-Specific High-Intensity Interval Training Protocol on the Biomarkers of Cardiovascular and Biochemical Recovery in Collegiate Athletes.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Trial
- Observational
- Blood Biochemical Acute Daily Responses During an Intensive Training Microcycle: A Case Report of an Olympic Kayaker.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neuromuscular performance and biochemical response to maximal anaerobic effort: assessment of longterm adaptations in professional tennis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dose-response to endurance training: a longitudinal study of training load and biomarkers in elite triathletes.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Physical exercise in metabolic myopathies at risk of rhabdomyolysis: a feasible approach or an unavoidable hazard?European journal of applied physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Creatine kinase (CK) activity has been generally considered as reliable blood marker for assessing muscle function, damage, and repair. However, the greatest challenge in the interpretation of CK activity remains the high variability in CK increase in relation to degrees of muscle cell damage or disturbance. Several known contributors to CK variability have been identified. The most important include the type of training, exercise intensity, gender differences, body composition, intra- and interindividual biological variability, as well as preanalytical and analytical considerations. Creatine kinase variability following different types of exercise reflects the complex interplay between exercise modality, intensity, individual physiology, and recovery strategies. High-intensity exercises, especially those involving eccentric muscle contractions, tend to produce more significant CK responses due to greater muscle fiber disruption. Gender differences in CK variability are pronounced, with men generally exhibiting higher CK activities following exercise compared to women. Creatine kinase variability is also closely linked to body composition, with muscle mass generally leading to higher CK activities post-exercise, while higher body fat may correlate with lower CK responses. Regarding preanalytical and analytical considerations, perhaps the greatest challenge in CK measurement is the limited sample stability, which should always be taken into consideration when analyzing CK activity in stored samples for research or clinical purposes. This review, through exploring all of the above-mentioned sources of CK variability, could facilitate the development of evidence-based practices for preventing overuse injuries, and promoting long-term athlete health and well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.