ArticleResuscitation plus2025
Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a feasible option for patients with pregnancy-associated diagnoses who require mechanical circulatory support.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is used in patients with cardiopulmonary collapse, but data regarding its use in pregnancy is limited. We aimed to identify the clinical characteristics and predictors of in-hospital mortality in female patients requiring VA-ECMO, including evaluating the role of pregnancy. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a cohort of female patients aged 19-45 years who required VA-ECMO were identified from the National Inpatient Sample from 2018 to 2021 and further stratified according to presence of pregnancy-associated diagnoses. Baseline characteristics were compared using Pearson chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Multivariate analysis using a logistic regression model was performed to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality in the entire cohort. Subgroup analyses were done in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Results: Of 2,010 female patients requiring VA-ECMO, 255 (12.7%) had a pregnancy-associated diagnosis. Cardiogenic shock was more common among patients without a pregnancy-associated diagnosis. There was no difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups ( Conclusions: VA-ECMO remains a feasible option in patients with pregnancy-associated diagnoses requiring mechanical circulatory support. Infection control is required to decrease the associated in-hospital mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.