ArticleResuscitation plus2025
Organisations supporting cardiac arrest survivors: An exploratory survey of organisational structures and activities.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychological and cognitive support after cardiac arrest: a systematic review.Resuscitation plus · 2026Review
- Cardiac Arrest Survivors' Perspectives to Inform the Co-Design of a Web-Based Support and Learning Platform: Qualitative Content Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiac arrest survivors have diverse needs beyond healthcare, including spirituality, social networks, practical, legal, and economic matters, highlighting the need for community-based support. While some non-governmental organisations support various patient groups, little is known about those dedicated to cardiac arrest survivors. The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) conducted a survey to identify and understand these organisations' structures and activities. Methods: An internet survey developed by the ERC was disseminated through media channels, national resuscitation councils, and social networks. Responses were verified against publicly available information to confirm declared activities and sustained support efforts. Organisations were classified based on whether their primary focus was on cardiac arrest survivors or if support was a secondary activity. Results: Of fifty-six responses, eight organisations were identified as providing structured, continuous support. Six primarily focused on cardiac arrest survivors, while two had a broader scope. Most were established after 2000, with six in Europe and two in the United States. Membership ranged from 520 to 3000 survivors. Common activities included peer support and distributing information materials. Connections with healthcare systems varied, with three reporting none. Only two were represented in their national resuscitation councils (NRCs). Conclusions: Organisations supporting cardiac arrest survivors are scarce but address important unmet needs. However, public presence is limited, and ties with institutions remain weak. Strengthening collaborations with healthcare providers, NRCs, and stakeholders could enhance support networks and improve long-term post-resuscitation care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.