ReviewMaterials today. Bio2025
Harnessing nanoprodrugs to enhance cancer immunotherapy: overcoming barriers to precision treatment.
Review in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- mRNA-based melanoma vaccines targeting gp100 and TRP2 macromolecules.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Innovative Strategies of Nanocapsules for Maximizing Efficacy in Tumor Immunotherapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- CD24 as an innate immune checkpoint in solid tumors: biology, biomarker stratification, and therapeutic translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Nanocarrier-based immunotherapy for viral diseases.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2025Review
- Polymer Network-Based Nanogels and Microgels: Design, Classification, Synthesis, and Applications in Drug Delivery.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Clinical trials of nanoparticle-enhanced CAR-T and NK cell therapies in oncology: overcoming translational and clinical challenges - a mini review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Bridging the Gap: The Role of Advanced Formulation Strategies in the Clinical Translation of Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery Systems.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanoprodrugs, leveraging advanced nanoparticle-based delivery systems, represent a promising strategy to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy in cancer treatment. These systems offer precise tumor targeting, controlled drug release, and the potential to modulate the immune microenvironment, addressing several limitations of conventional therapeutic approaches. This review systematically evaluates the role of nanoprodrugs in improving immunotherapy outcomes, focusing on their ability to overcome challenges such as poor bioavailability, systemic toxicity, and limited tumor specificity. We also discuss the key advantages of these systems, including their ability to co-deliver immune checkpoint inhibitors and other immunomodulatory agents, potentially enabling more synergistic and effective treatment strategies. Despite their promise, several challenges remain, including achieving precise control over drug release, integrating multiple stimulus-responsive mechanisms, addressing tumor heterogeneity, and overcoming barriers to clinical translation. The review concludes with a perspective on future directions, emphasizing the need for further optimization of nanomaterial design, improved delivery strategies, and solutions to the complexities of the tumor microenvironment to maximize the clinical impact of nanoprodrugs in cancer immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.