Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40520505›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

SpyKing-Privacy-preserving framework for Spiking Neural Networks.

Farzad Nikfam, Alberto Marchisio, Maurizio Martina, Muhammad Shafique

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Farzad NikfamVery Large Scale Integration Laboratory, Department of Electronics Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Alberto MarchisioeBrain Lab, Division of Engineering, New York University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Maurizio MartinaVery Large Scale Integration Laboratory, Department of Electronics Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Muhammad ShafiqueeBrain Lab, Division of Engineering, New York University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) models, frequently built using deep neural networks (DNNs), have become integral to many aspects of modern life. However, the vast amount of data they process is not always secure, posing potential risks to privacy and safety. Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) enables computations on encrypted data while preserving its confidentiality, making it a promising approach for privacy-preserving AI. This study evaluates the performance of FHE when applied to DNNs and compares it with Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs), which more closely resemble biological neurons and, under certain conditions, may achieve superior results. Using the SpyKing framework, we analyze key challenges in encrypted neural computations, particularly the limitations of FHE in handling non-linear operations. To ensure a comprehensive evaluation, we conducted experiments on the MNIST, FashionMNIST, and CIFAR10 datasets while systematically varying encryption parameters to optimize SNN performance. Our results show that FHE significantly increases computational costs but remains viable in terms of accuracy and data security. Furthermore, SNNs achieved up to 35% higher absolute accuracy than DNNs on encrypted data with low values of the plaintext modulus

Indexed as

Deep Neural Network (DNN)Homomorphic Encryption (HE)LeNet5machine learningprivacy-preservingsafetysecuritySpiking Neural Network (SNN)

Identifiers

PMID40520505
PMCPMC12162590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.