Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40520499›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Molar Extraction and Bone Grafting to Optimize Bone Stock for Future Mandibular Distraction.

Aaron I Dadzie, Sydney Somers, Mitchell Dunklebarger, Laurel Ormiston, Duane Yamashiro, Barbu Gociman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aaron I DadzieFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Sydney SomersFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Mitchell DunklebargerFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Laurel OrmistonFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Duane YamashiroFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Barbu GocimanFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mandibular distraction osteogenesis is a major modality in treating micrognathia associated with severe class II malocclusion. Shortcomings associated with mandibular distraction are often secondary to lack of adequate bone at the level of the osteotomies, either from insufficient original bone stock or paucity of bone secondary to previous surgical procedures. To address the challenge of limited bone availability at the distraction site, our institution has implemented a stepwise protocol in the patients with severe class II malocclusion and insufficient bone stock at the level of the planned osteotomy. Extraction of the mandibular third molar(s), followed by grafting of the resulting defect is performed initially. Either autologous bone graft or the combination graft material consisting of a mixture of demineralized bone matrix, bone morphogenic protein, and freeze-dried bone chips is used. Computed tomography is performed 9 months later to assess the bone stock at the level of the graft site. This technique is presented here with 100% graft take in all 9 grafted sites (6 patients). This technique appears to offer an effective way to prepare the mandible for optimization of subsequent mandibular distraction in patients with severely micrognathic mandibles and insufficient bone stock posterior to the third molar. Of note, both autologous bone and the mixture of demineralized bone matrix, bone morphogenic protein, and freeze-dried bone chips seem equally efficacious.

Identifiers

PMID40520499
PMCPMC12165662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.