ArticleOphthalmology science
Diabetic Retinopathy Assessment through Multitask Learning Approach on Heterogeneous Fundus Image Datasets.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explicit Inclusion of Diabetes Mellitus Without Retinopathy Within Diabetic Retinopathy Prediction.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- MultiRetNet: A Lightweight Explainable AI Approach to Diabetic Retinopathy Grading and DME Detection Using Fundus-OCT Fusion.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Grounded report generation for enhancing ophthalmic ultrasound interpretation using Vision-Language Segmentation models.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based system, Diabetic Retinopathy Analysis Model Assistant (DRAMA), for diagnosing diabetic retinopathy (DR) across multisource heterogeneous datasets and aimed at improving the diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. Design: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at Zhejiang University Eye Hospital and approved by the ethics committee. Subjects: The study included 1500 retinal images from 957 participants aged 18 to 83 years. The dataset was divided into 3 subdatasets: color fundus photography, ultra-widefield imaging, and portable fundus camera. Images were annotated by 3 experienced ophthalmologists. Methods: The AI system was built using EfficientNet-B2, pretrained on the ImageNet dataset. It performed 11 multilabel tasks, including image type identification, quality assessment, lesion detection, and diabetic macular edema (DME) detection. The model used LabelSmoothingCrossEntropy and AdamP optimizer to enhance robustness and convergence. The system's performance was evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). External validation was conducted using datasets from different clinical centers. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes measured were the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of the AI system in diagnosing DR. Results: After excluding 218 poor-quality images, DRAMA demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, with EfficientNet-B2 achieving 87.02% accuracy in quality assessment and 91.60% accuracy in lesion detection. Area under the curves were >0.95 for most tasks, with 0.93 for grading and DME detection. External validation showed slightly lower accuracy in some tasks but outperformed in identifying hemorrhages and DME. Diabetic Retinopathy Analysis Model Assistant diagnosed the entire test set in 86 ms, significantly faster than the 90 to 100 minutes required by humans. Conclusions: Diabetic Retinopathy Analysis Model Assistant, an AI-based multitask model, showed high potential for clinical integration, significantly improving the diagnostic efficiency and accuracy, particularly in resource-limited settings. Financial Disclosures: The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.