Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40520453›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2025

Hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulfate-based medical devices: formulations, esophageal mucosal protection, and their place in the management of GERD.

Carmelo Scarpignato, Nicola De Bortoli, Paola Iovino, Andrea Nacci, Giovanni Sarnelli, Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carmelo ScarpignatoDepartment of Health Sciences, United Campus of Malta, MSD 9024, Msida 9024, Malta.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5645-857X
Nicola De BortoliGastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1995-1060
Paola IovinoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Andrea NacciENT Audiology and Phoniatric Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Giovanni SarnelliDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Edoardo Vincenzo SavarinoDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3187-2894

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains a challenging condition, even in the third millennium. For much of the past century, Schwartz's dictum-"No acid, no ulcer"-has shaped our approach to acid-related diseases, making acid suppression the cornerstone of therapy. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely regarded as the standard treatment for GERD. However, they provide only symptomatic relief and do not address the underlying disease. Moreover, nearly 50% of patients experience limited or no response to PPIs in clinical practice. Recent advances in understanding GERD's pathophysiology, particularly the role of impaired mucosal integrity, have led to innovative therapeutic strategies. Among these, medical devices designed to prevent reflux or coat the esophageal mucosa and form a stable protective barrier represent a significant breakthrough. Esophageal mucosal protection is emerging as a promising approach, especially for patients who do not respond adequately to PPIs. While mucosal-protective agents such as sucralfate and irsogladine have long been available, their formulations have not been well-suited for esophageal protection. The rapid transit time of liquids through the esophagus (typically just a few seconds, even in a supine position) limits the duration of contact between active ingredients and the mucosa. However, hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulfate-based medical devices have revolutionized the field by enabling active ingredients to adhere to the esophageal lining, ensuring prolonged contact and enhanced protection. Further advancements have led to the development of three distinct formulations (Esoxx™ One, Esoxx Defence, and Esoxx Protection), incorporating additional components, that is, Poloxamer 407, aluminum hydroxide, or natural remedies such as

Indexed as

chondroitin sulphatediagnosisGERDhyaluronic acidLPRmedical devicesmucosal protectionNERDPPIstreatment

Identifiers

PMID40520453
PMCPMC12163284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.