Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40520436›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Among Afflicted Women.

Zuoping Shi, Huiping Liu, Jie Han, Xueqing Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zuoping ShiReproductive Medicine Centre, Children's Hospital of Shanxi and Women Health Center of Shanxi, Taiyuan, 030001, People's Republic of China.
Huiping LiuReproductive Medicine Centre, Children's Hospital of Shanxi and Women Health Center of Shanxi, Taiyuan, 030001, People's Republic of China.
Jie HanReproductive Medicine Centre, Children's Hospital of Shanxi and Women Health Center of Shanxi, Taiyuan, 030001, People's Republic of China.
Xueqing WuReproductive Medicine Centre, Children's Hospital of Shanxi and Women Health Center of Shanxi, Taiyuan, 030001, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5044-9832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To explore the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) of women with unexplained RPL. Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled women with unexplained RPL in the Reproductive Medicine Centre of Shanxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital between August 28 Results: A total of 485 valid questionnaires were included, with knowledge, attitude, and practice scores of 13.05 ± 6.24, 39.30 ± 3.09, and 41.11 ± 4.37, respectively. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that knowledge scores (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.09, P = 0.001; beneficial), attitude scores (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.20-1.41, P < 0.001), and urban residence (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.41-0.99, P = 0.049) were independently associated with the proactive practice. The structural equation modeling (SEM) showed that knowledge directly (β = 0.20, P = 0.001) and indirectly (β = 0.15, P < 0.001) influenced practices. Conclusion: Women with unexplained RPL demonstrated insufficient knowledge, moderate attitude, and proactive practice towards RPL. Targeted educational interventions could be needed to enhance knowledge related to RPL, which may help women form proper expectations toward pregnancy.

Indexed as

attitudecross-sectional studyknowledgepracticerecurrent pregnancy loss

Identifiers

PMID40520436
PMCPMC12166855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.