ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Automated identification of older adults at risk for cognitive decline.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated identification of older adults at risk for cognitive decline.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAutomated models that predict cognitive risk in older adults can aid decisions about which patients to screen in busy primary care settings.
methodsIn this retrospective prediction model development study, we conducted formal cognitive testing on 337 older primary care patients to establish cognitive status. We used up to 5 years of prior discrete-field electronic health record (EHR) data to develop a multivariable prediction model that differentiates patients with impaired versus intact cognition.
resultsThe final model included seven easily extractable variables with known associations to cognitive decline: age, race, pulse, systolic blood pressure, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory use, history of mood disorder, and family history of neurological disease. The model demonstrated good discrimination of cognitive status (concordance statistic = 0.72). DISCUSSION: The cognitive risk model may be useful clinically to prompt for objective cognitive screening in high-risk patients. The use of common, discrete variables ensures relative ease of implementation in EHRs. Highlights: 337 older primary care patients completed full neuropsychological assessment.Risk modeling used data available in a typical primary care record.The model successfully differentiated patients with/without cognitive impairment.This EHR model offers a passive workflow to identify patients at cognitive risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.