ArticleRespiratory medicine case reports2025
Acute eosinophilic pneumonia associated with mefloquine prophylaxis: A case report.
Article in Respiratory medicine case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Eosinophilic pneumonia is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of the lung parenchyma, which can present as acute respiratory failure. Drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia (DIEP) has been associated with several medications, though the pathophysiological mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Among antimalarial agents, mefloquine has rarely been implicated in severe pulmonary adverse effects. Case presentation: We report the case of a 34-year-old previously healthy female who developed acute respiratory failure after completing a prophylactic regimen of mefloquine for malaria prevention. The patient initially presented with fever, dyspnea, and hypoxemia, rapidly progressing to severe respiratory distress requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Laboratory tests revealed marked eosinophilia, while thoracic computed tomography (CT) demonstrated diffuse ground-glass opacities and nodular infiltrates. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was positive for Rhinovirus, suggesting a possible interplay between drug-induced hypersensitivity and viral infection. Following corticosteroid therapy and supportive care, the patient's condition improved, with resolution of eosinophilia and radiological abnormalities. Discussion: This case highlights the need for heightened clinical suspicion of mefloquine-induced eosinophilic pneumonia in patients presenting with unexplained respiratory symptoms following antimalarial prophylaxis. The pathogenesis may involve immune-mediated reactions and oxidative stress, potentially exacerbated by concurrent infections. Conclusion: Mefloquine should be considered a potential cause of acute eosinophilic pneumonia, particularly in patients with recent drug exposure. Early recognition and timely management, including drug discontinuation and corticosteroid therapy, are crucial to preventing severe complications and ensuring favorable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.